Cognitive dissonance or contrast?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Cognitive Dissonance
Almost half a century ago social psychologist Leon Festinger developed the cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957). The theory has obviously stood the test of time in that it is mentioned in most general and social psychology textbooks today. The theory is somewhat counterintuitive and, in fact, fits into a category of counterintuitive social psychology theories sometimes referred to as a...
متن کاملCognitive Dissonance
Almost half a century ago social psychologist Leon Festinger developed the cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957). The theory has obviously stood the test of time in that it is mentioned in most general and social psychology textbooks today. The theory is somewhat counterintuitive and, in fact, fits into a category of counterintuitive social psychology theories sometimes referred to as a...
متن کاملCognitive Dissonance in Negotiation 1 Running Head: COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IN NEGOTIATION Cognitive dissonance in negotiation: Free choice or counter-attitudinal justification?
Previous research suggests that negotiators inflate their valuation for offers they make and devalue offers they choose not to make due to the psychological process of cognitive dissonance reduction. Research outside of the negotiation context suggests that cognitive dissonance is induced either by being forced to choose among relatively equal options or by having to justify a counterattitudina...
متن کاملInstrumentalizing Cognitive Dissonance Emotions
Many psychologists think that there are few basic emotions, and most emotions are combinations of these few. Here we advance a hypothesis that the number of principally different emotions is near infinite. We consider emotions as mental states with hedonic content, indicating satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Basic emotions correspond to bodily signals, and there are relatively few of them. Our...
متن کاملCognitive Dissonance and Choice
People like to feel good about past decisions. This paper models selfjusti cation of past decisions. The model is axiomatic: axioms are de ned on preference over ex ante actions (modeled formally by menus). The representation of preference admits the interpretation that the agent adjusts beliefs after taking an action so as to be more optimistic about its possible consequences. In particular, t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Animal Sentience
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2377-7478
DOI: 10.51291/2377-7478.1111